HIPAA Certification Readiness Checklist
Framework: Excalibur.Dispatch Standard: HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) Focus: Security Rule + Privacy Rule technical safeguards Status: Framework capabilities mapped to HIPAA requirements Last Updated: 2026-01-01
Overview
This checklist provides step-by-step guidance for HIPAA compliance preparation using the Excalibur framework. While HIPAA compliance requires both technical and organizational controls, this checklist focuses on the technical safeguards provided by the framework.
HIPAA Scope: Protected Health Information (PHI) for covered entities and business associates Compliance Approach: Framework-provided technical safeguards + consumer organizational policies
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: HIPAA compliance requires comprehensive organizational policies, workforce training, and business associate agreements beyond the scope of this framework. Consult with a HIPAA compliance specialist and legal counsel to ensure full compliance.
HIPAA Security Rule Overview
| Category | Safeguards | Required? | Framework Support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative Safeguards | §164.308 | Required | ⚠️ Partial (policies + training consumer responsibility) |
| Physical Safeguards | §164.310 | Required | ⚠️ Partial (data center security consumer responsibility) |
| Technical Safeguards | §164.312 | Required | ✅ Full (encryption, access control, audit, transmission security) |
Focus: This checklist covers Technical Safeguards (§164.312) where the framework provides direct implementation.
Control Mapping Table
Technical Safeguards (§164.312)
| Standard | Implementation Spec | R/A | Framework Implementation | Consumer Action | Evidence Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| §164.312(a)(1) | Access Control | R | ✅ [RequirePermission], RBAC | Configure access controls | docs/advanced/security.md:15-78 |
| §164.312(a)(2)(i) | Unique User ID | R | ✅ User identity in audit logs | Assign unique user IDs | docs/security/audit-logging.md |
| §164.312(a)(2)(ii) | Emergency Access | R | ⚠️ Partial | Configure emergency procedures | Business policy |
| §164.312(a)(2)(iii) | Automatic Logoff | A | ⚠️ Partial | Configure session timeouts | Application configuration |
| §164.312(a)(2)(iv) | Encryption & Decryption | A | ✅ AES-256-GCM (IEncryptionProvider) | Enable encryption | docs/advanced/security.md:170-213 |
| §164.312(b) | Audit Controls | R | ✅ IAuditLogger (tamper-evident) | Configure audit logging | docs/security/audit-logging.md |
| §164.312(c)(1) | Integrity | R | ✅ Hash chain, versioning | Verify integrity controls | docs/security/audit-logging.md |
| §164.312(c)(2) | Mechanism to Authenticate | A | ✅ Digital signatures, HMAC | Configure authentication | Business policy |
| §164.312(d) | Person/Entity Authentication | R | ✅ OAuth2, JWT, password hashing | Configure authentication | docs/advanced/security.md:80-125 |
| §164.312(e)(1) | Transmission Security | R | ✅ TLS 1.2+ | Configure TLS | docs/advanced/security.md:127-168 |
| §164.312(e)(2)(i) | Integrity Controls | A | ✅ Message signing, checksums | Verify transmission integrity | Business policy |
| §164.312(e)(2)(ii) | Encryption | A | ✅ TLS 1.2+ | Enable TLS | docs/security/transport-security.md |
Legend:
- R = Required
- A = Addressable (required unless alternative equivalent)
- ✅ = Framework provides full implementation
- ⚠️ = Framework provides tools, consumer implements policy
Implementation Checklist
Phase 1: Prerequisites (Week 1)
1.1 Understand HIPAA Scope
- Determine if you are a covered entity or business associate
- Identify all systems that process, store, or transmit PHI
- Classify data (PHI vs non-PHI)
- Document system boundaries
PHI Examples:
- Patient names, addresses, birthdates
- Medical record numbers
- Health plan beneficiary numbers
- Device identifiers (e.g., pacemaker serial numbers)
- Biometric identifiers
- Diagnoses, treatment information
Reference: HHS PHI Definition
1.2 Install Framework Packages
dotnet add package Excalibur.Domain # For encryption, audit, access control
dotnet add package Excalibur.Dispatch.Compliance # For GDPR erasure (right to access)
1.3 Engage HIPAA Compliance Specialist
- Hire HIPAA compliance consultant or legal counsel
- Conduct Risk Assessment (required by §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A))
- Develop Security Policies and Procedures
- Develop Privacy Policies and Procedures
- Create Business Associate Agreements (BAAs)
CRITICAL: This checklist does NOT replace professional HIPAA compliance guidance. You MUST engage a qualified specialist.
Phase 2: Administrative Safeguards (§164.308) - Week 2-3
NOTE: Administrative Safeguards are primarily organizational policies. The framework does NOT automate these. Consult with your compliance specialist.
2.1 Security Management Process (§164.308(a)(1))
Required:
- Risk Analysis (identify threats to PHI)
- Risk Management (implement security measures)
- Sanction Policy (consequences for violations)
- Information System Activity Review (audit log review)
Framework Support:
IAuditLoggerprovides audit logs for review (§164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D))
Evidence:
- Risk assessment documentation
- Sanction policy
- Audit log review procedures
- Monthly audit log review reports
2.2 Assigned Security Responsibility (§164.308(a)(2))
Required:
- Designate Security Official responsible for HIPAA compliance
- Document appointment in writing
2.3 Workforce Security (§164.308(a)(3))
Required:
- Authorization/Supervision procedures
- Workforce clearance procedures
- Termination procedures (revoke access)
Framework Support:
[RequirePermission]enforces authorization- RBAC for role-based access control
2.4 Information Access Management (§164.308(a)(4))
Required:
- Isolating Healthcare Clearinghouse Functions (if applicable)
- Access Authorization (grant minimum necessary access)
- Access Establishment and Modification
Framework Support:
[RequirePermission]attribute for access control- Role-based permission assignments
2.5 Security Awareness and Training (§164.308(a)(5))
Required:
- Security Reminders (periodic)
- Protection from Malicious Software
- Log-in Monitoring
- Password Management
Framework Support:
- Password hashing (Argon2id) via framework
- Login audit events via
IAuditLogger
2.6 Security Incident Procedures (§164.308(a)(6))
Required:
- Response and Reporting procedures
Framework Support:
- Incident detection via audit logs and monitoring
Evidence:
- Incident response plan
- Incident logs
- Breach notification procedures
2.7 Contingency Plan (§164.308(a)(7))
Required:
- Data Backup Plan
- Disaster Recovery Plan
- Emergency Mode Operation Plan
Framework Support:
- N/A (infrastructure/business policy)
2.8 Evaluation (§164.308(a)(8))
Required:
- Periodic technical and non-technical evaluation (annual recommended)
Framework Support:
- Automated control validation (SOC 2 validators can be used)
Phase 3: Physical Safeguards (§164.310) - Week 4
NOTE: Physical Safeguards are primarily data center and facility controls. For cloud deployments, these are typically inherited from cloud provider (Azure, AWS, GCP).
3.1 Facility Access Controls (§164.310(a)(1))
Required:
- Contingency Operations (facility for backup operations)
- Facility Security Plan (safeguard against unauthorized access)
- Access Control and Validation (control physical access)
- Maintenance Records (repairs and modifications)
Framework Support:
- N/A (cloud provider responsibility for IaaS/PaaS)
Cloud Provider Evidence:
- Azure: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP certifications
- AWS: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP certifications
- GCP: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, FedRAMP certifications
3.2 Workstation Use (§164.310(b))
Required:
- Policy on proper workstation use
Framework Support:
- N/A (organizational policy)
3.3 Workstation Security (§164.310(c))
Required:
- Physical safeguards for workstations accessing PHI
Framework Support:
- N/A (endpoint security, MDM solutions)
3.4 Device and Media Controls (§164.310(d)(1))
Required:
- Disposal (secure disposal/reuse of PHI)
- Media Re-use (remove PHI before reuse)
- Accountability (track hardware/media movements)
- Data Backup and Storage
Framework Support:
IErasureServicefor cryptographic erasure (secure disposal)- Backup/storage (cloud provider or consumer infrastructure)
Evidence:
- Media disposal procedures
- Erasure certificates (cryptographic erasure)
- Asset tracking logs
Phase 4: Technical Safeguards (§164.312) - Week 5-7
NOTE: This is where the framework provides the MOST value. Focus your implementation effort here.
4.1 Access Control (§164.312(a)(1)) [REQUIRED]
Control Requirement: Implement technical policies and procedures that allow only authorized persons to access electronic PHI (ePHI).
Framework Implementation:
[RequirePermission]attribute for declarative authorization- Role-based access control (RBAC)
Consumer Checklist:
- Apply
[RequirePermission]to all PHI access operations
Code Example:
using Excalibur.A3.Authorization;
[RequirePermission("phi.read")]
public class GetPatientRecordAction : IDispatchAction
{
public Guid PatientId { get; set; }
}
[RequirePermission("phi.write")]
public class UpdatePatientRecordAction : IDispatchAction
{
public Guid PatientId { get; set; }
public PatientRecord Record { get; set; }
}
- Define role-to-permission mappings (minimum necessary access)
Role Examples:
{
"Roles": {
"Physician": ["phi.read", "phi.write", "prescriptions.create"],
"Nurse": ["phi.read", "vitals.write"],
"Receptionist": ["demographics.read", "appointments.write"],
"BillingClerk": ["billing.read", "billing.write"]
}
}
- Test authorization enforcement (unauthorized access denied)
Evidence:
docs/advanced/security.md:15-78- Authorization guide- Permission catalog (roles and permissions)
- Unit tests for authorization
- Access control policy documentation
SSP Statement (BAA):
"§164.312(a)(1) Access Control is satisfied through the Excalibur framework's
[RequirePermission]attribute and role-based access control. Only authorized users with appropriate roles can access ePHI. Minimum necessary access is enforced through granular permissions."
4.1.1 Unique User Identification (§164.312(a)(2)(i)) [REQUIRED]
Consumer Checklist:
- Assign unique user ID to each user (no shared accounts)
- Capture user ID in all audit logs
Code Example:
// Audit log includes unique user ID
await _auditLogger.LogAsync(new AuditEvent
{
EventId = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
EventType = AuditEventType.DataAccess,
Action = "PHI.Read",
ActorId = currentUser.Id,
Outcome = AuditOutcome.Success,
Timestamp = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow,
ResourceId = patientId.ToString(),
ResourceType = "Patient"
}, CancellationToken.None);
- Test audit logs include user ID
Evidence:
- User provisioning procedures
- Audit log samples showing unique user IDs
- No shared account verification
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(a)(2)(i) Unique User Identification is satisfied by assigning each user a unique identifier. All audit logs capture the user ID of the individual accessing ePHI. Shared accounts are prohibited."
4.1.2 Emergency Access Procedure (§164.312(a)(2)(ii)) [REQUIRED]
Consumer Checklist:
- Document emergency access procedures (break-glass scenarios)
- Create emergency access role with elevated permissions
- Log all emergency access usage
- Review emergency access logs weekly
Policy Example:
"Emergency Access Procedure: In medical emergencies where patient care requires immediate ePHI access and normal authentication is unavailable, the on-call physician may use the emergency access account. All emergency access is logged and reviewed by the Security Official within 24 hours."
Evidence:
- Emergency access policy
- Emergency access audit logs
- Weekly review reports
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(a)(2)(ii) Emergency Access Procedure is satisfied through a documented break-glass procedure. Emergency access is logged via
IAuditLoggerand reviewed by the Security Official within 24 hours."
4.1.3 Automatic Logoff (§164.312(a)(2)(iii)) [ADDRESSABLE]
Consumer Checklist:
- Configure session timeout (15-30 minutes recommended for PHI systems)
- Test automatic logoff after inactivity
Code Example:
// ASP.NET Core session timeout
services.AddSession(options =>
{
options.IdleTimeout = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(15); // HIPAA recommendation
options.Cookie.HttpOnly = true;
options.Cookie.IsEssential = true;
});
- Document session timeout configuration
Evidence:
- Session timeout configuration
- Timeout testing results
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(a)(2)(iii) Automatic Logoff is satisfied through a 15-minute session timeout. Users are automatically logged off after 15 minutes of inactivity to prevent unauthorized access."
4.1.4 Encryption and Decryption (§164.312(a)(2)(iv)) [ADDRESSABLE]
Consumer Checklist:
- Enable encryption at rest for all ePHI
Code Example:
using Excalibur.Dispatch.Compliance;
services.AddEncryption(encryption => encryption
.UseKeyManagement<AesGcmEncryptionProvider>("aes-gcm-primary")
.ConfigureOptions(options => options.DefaultPurpose = "field-encryption"));
// Annotate PHI fields
public class PatientRecord
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
[PersonalData] // Encrypted at rest
public string FirstName { get; set; }
[PersonalData]
public string LastName { get; set; }
[PersonalData]
public string SSN { get; set; }
[PersonalData]
[Sensitive]
public string Diagnosis { get; set; }
[PersonalData]
[Sensitive]
public string TreatmentPlan { get; set; }
}
- Verify encryption at rest (inspect database)
- Configure key rotation (90-day recommended)
- Document encryption configuration
Evidence:
docs/advanced/security.md:170-213- Encryption guide- Encryption verification tests
- Key management procedures
- Database inspection (encrypted values)
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(a)(2)(iv) Encryption and Decryption is satisfied through AES-256-GCM encryption at rest using the Excalibur framework. All ePHI fields are annotated with
[PersonalData]and automatically encrypted. Encryption keys are managed via Azure Key Vault with 90-day rotation."
4.2 Audit Controls (§164.312(b)) [REQUIRED]
Control Requirement: Implement hardware, software, and/or procedural mechanisms that record and examine activity in information systems that contain or use ePHI.
Framework Implementation:
IAuditLoggerinterface with tamper-evident hash chain- Structured audit logs capturing who/what/when/where
- Immutable append-only audit trails
Consumer Checklist:
- Configure audit logging for all PHI access
Code Example:
using Excalibur.Dispatch.Compliance;
public class PatientRecordService
{
private readonly IAuditLogger _auditLogger;
public async Task<PatientRecord> GetRecordAsync(Guid patientId, CancellationToken ct)
{
var record = await _repository.GetAsync(patientId, ct);
// Audit PHI access
await _auditLogger.LogAsync(new AuditEvent
{
EventId = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
EventType = AuditEventType.DataAccess,
Action = "PHI.Read",
ActorId = _currentUser.Id,
Outcome = AuditOutcome.Success,
Timestamp = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow,
ResourceId = patientId.ToString(),
ResourceType = "Patient",
Metadata = new Dictionary<string, string>
{
["FieldsAccessed"] = "FirstName,LastName,Diagnosis"
}
}, ct);
return record;
}
public async Task UpdateRecordAsync(PatientRecord record, CancellationToken ct)
{
await _repository.UpdateAsync(record, ct);
// Audit PHI modification
await _auditLogger.LogAsync(new AuditEvent
{
EventId = Guid.NewGuid().ToString(),
EventType = AuditEventType.DataModification,
Action = "PHI.Update",
ActorId = _currentUser.Id,
Outcome = AuditOutcome.Success,
Timestamp = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow,
ResourceId = record.Id.ToString(),
ResourceType = "Patient",
Metadata = new Dictionary<string, string>
{
["FieldsModified"] = "Diagnosis,TreatmentPlan"
}
}, ct);
}
}
- Configure audit event types (access, create, update, delete, export, print)
- Implement audit log retention (6 years HIPAA requirement)
- Configure RBAC for audit log access (Security Official only)
- Test hash chain integrity verification
Audit Events to Capture:
- PHI access (read)
- PHI creation
- PHI modification
- PHI deletion (with erasure certificate)
- PHI export (download, print, email)
- Authentication (login, logout, failed attempts)
- Authorization failures (access denied)
- Configuration changes (roles, permissions)
Evidence:
docs/security/audit-logging.md- Audit logging guide- Audit log samples (anonymized)
- Audit log retention policy (6 years)
- Hash chain integrity verification tests
- Conformance test results (AuditStoreConformanceTestKit - 18 tests)
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(b) Audit Controls is satisfied through the Excalibur framework's
IAuditLoggerwith tamper-evident hash chain. All ePHI access, modifications, and deletions are logged with user ID, timestamp, and action. Audit logs are retained for 6 years per HIPAA requirements."
4.3 Integrity (§164.312(c)(1)) [REQUIRED]
Control Requirement: Implement policies and procedures to protect ePHI from improper alteration or destruction.
Framework Implementation:
- Hash chain integrity for audit logs
- Event versioning in event sourcing
- Optimistic concurrency control
Consumer Checklist:
- Verify hash chain integrity (audit logs cannot be tampered)
- Test concurrency control (prevent lost updates)
Code Example:
// Optimistic concurrency via event sourcing
public class Patient : AggregateRoot
{
public void UpdateDiagnosis(string newDiagnosis)
{
// Event versioning prevents concurrent updates
RaiseEvent(new DiagnosisUpdatedEvent
{
AggregateId = this.Id,
Version = this.Version + 1, // Concurrency control
NewDiagnosis = newDiagnosis,
UpdatedAt = DateTime.UtcNow
});
}
}
- Test integrity controls (detect tampering attempts)
Evidence:
- Hash chain integrity tests
- Concurrency control tests
- Version conflict handling tests
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(c)(1) Integrity is satisfied through tamper-evident hash chains for audit logs and optimistic concurrency control for ePHI updates. Hash chains detect any unauthorized modifications. Versioning prevents lost updates from concurrent access."
4.3.1 Mechanism to Authenticate ePHI (§164.312(c)(2)) [ADDRESSABLE]
Consumer Checklist:
- Implement digital signatures or HMAC for message authentication
- Verify message authenticity on receipt
Code Example:
// HMAC for message authentication
public class MessageAuthenticationService
{
private readonly string _secretKey;
public string ComputeHMAC(string message)
{
using var hmac = new HMACSHA256(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(_secretKey));
var hash = hmac.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(message));
return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);
}
public bool VerifyHMAC(string message, string receivedHMAC)
{
var computedHMAC = ComputeHMAC(message);
return computedHMAC == receivedHMAC;
}
}
- Document authentication mechanism
Evidence:
- HMAC implementation
- Message authentication tests
- Authentication policy
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(c)(2) Mechanism to Authenticate ePHI is satisfied through HMAC-SHA256 for message authentication. All ePHI transmitted between systems is signed and verified to prevent tampering."
4.4 Person or Entity Authentication (§164.312(d)) [REQUIRED]
Control Requirement: Implement procedures to verify that a person or entity seeking access to ePHI is the one claimed.
Framework Implementation:
- Argon2id password hashing (OWASP recommended)
- OAuth2 / OpenID Connect support
- JWT token validation
Consumer Checklist:
- Configure authentication mechanism (OAuth2, SAML, etc.)
- Enforce strong password policy (12+ characters, complexity)
- Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) for PHI access
Code Example:
using Excalibur.Security;
// Argon2id password hashing (OWASP defaults)
services.AddPasswordHasher(options =>
{
options.MemorySize = 65536; // 64 MB
options.Iterations = 4;
options.Parallelism = 4;
});
// OAuth2 / OpenID Connect
services.AddAuthentication("Bearer")
.AddJwtBearer(options =>
{
options.Authority = "https://login.microsoftonline.com/{tenant}";
options.TokenValidationParameters = new TokenValidationParameters
{
ValidateIssuer = true,
ValidateAudience = true,
ValidateLifetime = true,
ValidateIssuerSigningKey = true
};
});
- Test authentication (verify user identity before PHI access)
- Test MFA enforcement
- Document authentication procedures
Evidence:
docs/advanced/security.md:80-125- Password management guide- Authentication configuration
- MFA enforcement verification
- Password policy documentation
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(d) Person or Entity Authentication is satisfied through OAuth2/OpenID Connect with multi-factor authentication (MFA). Passwords are hashed using Argon2id. Users must authenticate with MFA before accessing ePHI."
4.5 Transmission Security (§164.312(e)(1)) [REQUIRED]
Control Requirement: Implement technical security measures to guard against unauthorized access to ePHI that is being transmitted over an electronic communications network.
Framework Implementation:
- TLS 1.2+ enforcement for all HTTP traffic
- Certificate validation
- Encryption in transit
Consumer Checklist:
- Configure TLS 1.2+ for all HTTP endpoints
- Disable insecure protocols (SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1)
Code Example:
// ASP.NET Core Startup.cs
services.Configure<HttpsConnectionAdapterOptions>(options =>
{
options.SslProtocols = SslProtocols.Tls12 | SslProtocols.Tls13;
});
// Enforce HTTPS redirection
app.UseHttpsRedirection();
app.UseHsts();
- Verify TLS configuration (testssl.sh or nmap)
- Document TLS configuration
Verification Command:
# Verify TLS 1.2+ enforcement
testssl.sh https://yourdomain.com
# Or using nmap
nmap --script ssl-enum-ciphers -p 443 yourdomain.com
Evidence:
docs/advanced/security.md:127-168- TLS configuration guidedocs/security/transport-security.md- Transport security guide- TLS scan results (testssl.sh output)
- Certificate configuration
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(e)(1) Transmission Security is satisfied through TLS 1.2+ enforcement for all HTTP traffic. Insecure protocols (SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1) are disabled. All ePHI transmitted over the network is encrypted."
4.5.1 Integrity Controls (§164.312(e)(2)(i)) [ADDRESSABLE]
Consumer Checklist:
- Implement message signing or checksums for transmitted ePHI
- Verify integrity on receipt
Code Example:
// Message integrity via checksum
public class TransmissionIntegrityService
{
public string ComputeChecksum(byte[] data)
{
using var sha256 = SHA256.Create();
var hash = sha256.ComputeHash(data);
return Convert.ToBase64String(hash);
}
public bool VerifyIntegrity(byte[] data, string expectedChecksum)
{
var actualChecksum = ComputeChecksum(data);
return actualChecksum == expectedChecksum;
}
}
- Test integrity verification (detect tampering)
Evidence:
- Checksum implementation
- Integrity verification tests
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(e)(2)(i) Integrity Controls is satisfied through SHA-256 checksums for transmitted ePHI. All messages include a checksum that is verified on receipt to detect tampering."
4.5.2 Encryption (§164.312(e)(2)(ii)) [ADDRESSABLE]
Consumer Checklist:
- Enable TLS 1.2+ encryption (see §164.312(e)(1) above)
- Verify encryption is active for all PHI transmissions
Evidence:
- TLS configuration (see §164.312(e)(1))
SSP Statement:
"§164.312(e)(2)(ii) Encryption is satisfied through TLS 1.2+ enforcement (see §164.312(e)(1))."
Privacy Rule (§164.500-534)
NOTE: The Privacy Rule is primarily organizational policies and procedures. The framework provides some technical capabilities (e.g., access logs, erasure), but full compliance requires comprehensive privacy policies, training, and business processes.
Key Privacy Rule Requirements
Individual Rights
- Right to Access (§164.524): Provide individuals access to their PHI within 30 days
- Framework support: Access audit logs verify fulfillment
- Right to Amend (§164.526): Allow individuals to request amendments to their PHI
- Framework support: Audit logs track amendment requests and fulfillment
- Right to an Accounting of Disclosures (§164.528): Provide list of PHI disclosures
- Framework support: Audit logs provide disclosure accounting
- Right to Request Restrictions (§164.522): Allow individuals to request restrictions on PHI use/disclosure
- Framework support: Access control can enforce restrictions
- Right to Request Confidential Communications (§164.522): Allow alternative communication methods
- Framework support: N/A (business process)
- Right to Receive Notice of Privacy Practices (§164.520): Provide privacy notice
- Framework support: N/A (business process)
Framework Support:
IAuditLoggerprovides disclosure accountingIErasureServiceprovides right to deletion (not required by HIPAA but good practice per GDPR)
Evidence:
- Privacy notice (HIPAA-compliant)
- Individual rights procedures
- Audit logs (access, amendments, disclosures)
- Request tracking logs
Consumer Responsibilities
Framework Provides:
- Technical safeguards (access control, audit, encryption, authentication, transmission security)
- Conformance test kits (80 tests: Audit, Erasure, LegalHold, DataInventory)
- Evidence collection (audit logs, encryption verification)
Consumer Must Implement:
- Administrative Safeguards: Risk assessment, policies, training, incident response
- Physical Safeguards: Facility security, workstation security, device disposal
- Privacy Policies: Notice of Privacy Practices, individual rights procedures
- Business Associate Agreements (BAAs): Contracts with vendors processing PHI
- Workforce Training: Annual HIPAA training for all employees
- Breach Notification: 60-day notification to HHS and affected individuals
Compliance Verification
Pre-Certification Testing
Week 8: Risk Assessment
- Conduct comprehensive Risk Assessment (required by §164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A))
- Identify all threats to PHI (natural, human, environmental)
- Assess current safeguards
- Determine residual risk
- Document risk management plan
Week 9: Policy Development
- Develop Security Policies and Procedures (all §164.308, §164.310, §164.312 requirements)
- Develop Privacy Policies (all §164.500-534 requirements)
- Create Notice of Privacy Practices
- Create Business Associate Agreement (BAA) template
Week 10: Technical Validation
- Verify technical safeguards (see Phase 4 above)
- Run conformance test kits (Audit, Erasure, etc.)
- Test access controls (unauthorized access denied)
- Test audit logging (all PHI access logged)
- Test encryption (data at rest and in transit)
- Test authentication (MFA enforced)
- Test transmission security (TLS 1.2+ enforced)
Week 11: Training
- Conduct HIPAA training for all workforce members
- Document training completion (attendance, signatures)
- Test workforce knowledge (quiz or assessment)
Week 12: External Audit (Optional but Recommended)
- Engage HIPAA compliance auditor
- Provide Risk Assessment and policies
- Demonstrate technical safeguards
- Remediate any findings
Evidence References
Primary Evidence
Framework Implementation:
docs/advanced/security.md- Comprehensive security guide (883 lines)docs/security/audit-logging.md- Audit logging guidedocs/security/transport-security.md- TLS configurationdocs/security/gdpr-compliance.md- Erasure (right to access/deletion)
Conformance Test Results:
- AuditStoreConformanceTestKit (18 tests) - §164.312(b)
- ErasureStoreConformanceTestKit (24 tests) - Secure disposal
- Encryption verification tests - §164.312(a)(2)(iv), §164.312(e)(2)(ii)
Audit Evidence:
- Audit log samples (PHI access, modifications, deletions)
- Disclosure accounting (audit logs)
- Authentication logs (successful/failed logins)
- Authorization failures (access denied)
Supporting Documentation
HIPAA Regulations:
- HHS HIPAA Overview
- Security Rule (§164.308-316)
- Privacy Rule (§164.500-534)
- Breach Notification Rule
Framework Documentation:
Continuous Compliance
Automated Monitoring
Daily:
- Audit log integrity verification (hash chain)
- Encryption key rotation status
- Authentication failures (detect brute force)
- Authorization failures (detect unauthorized access attempts)
Weekly:
- Emergency access log review (Security Official)
- Failed authentication attempts review
- Audit log completeness check
Monthly:
- Risk assessment update (new threats, vulnerabilities)
- Policy and procedure review
- Workforce training completion tracking
Annually:
- Comprehensive Risk Assessment
- Policy and procedure updates
- Workforce training (required annual HIPAA training)
- External audit (recommended)
Contact
Questions:
- HIPAA Compliance Specialist: Legal/regulatory guidance
- Product Manager: Privacy policy, individual rights procedures
- Software Architect: Technical safeguards, framework capabilities
- Project Manager: Audit coordination, evidence package
Escalation:
- PHI breach: Follow Breach Notification Rule (60-day notification to HHS)
- Compliance gaps: Engage HIPAA compliance specialist
- Audit requests: Contact Project Manager for evidence package
DISCLAIMER
This checklist provides guidance on technical safeguards implemented by the Excalibur framework. It does NOT constitute legal advice or guarantee HIPAA compliance.
HIPAA compliance requires:
- Comprehensive Risk Assessment
- Security and Privacy Policies
- Workforce Training
- Business Associate Agreements
- Breach Notification Procedures
- Physical Safeguards
- Administrative Safeguards
Consult with a qualified HIPAA compliance specialist and legal counsel to ensure full compliance.
See Also
- Compliance Checklists - All compliance checklists overview
- Audit Logging - Tamper-evident audit logging with hash chain integrity
- Encryption Architecture - Encryption at rest and in transit
Last Updated: 2026-01-01 Next Review: 2026-04-01 Status: HIPAA checklist COMPLETE ✅